During the Boston Massacre neither the British or the colonists were justified. Both were wrong in their actions and the Boston Massacre's severity could have been avoided. The British put acts and taxes on the colonists that they didn't think were fair so they didn't abide by them.

Was the Boston Massacre inevitable?

Worried that bloodshed was inevitable, some colonists reportedly pleaded with the soldiers to hold their fire as others dared them to shoot. Preston later reported a colonist told him the protestors planned to “carry off [White] from his post and probably murder him.”

Was the Boston Massacre necessary?

The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre helped spark the colonists' desire for American independence, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.

Do you think the American Revolution could have been avoided?

Given the political realities of the day, war appears to have been virtually inevitable. Even so, independence very likely would have been prevented had Britain had an adequate number of troops in America in April 1775 or a capable general to lead the campaign for New York in 1776, someone like Earl Cornwallis.

Who is to blame for the Boston Massacre?

The British were taxing the Colonists, and the Colonists were protesting and boycotting against the taxes creating tension between the two sides. Since this happened, the British soldiers are the ones to blame for the Boston Massacre.

The Boston Massacre - Snow and Gunpowder - Extra History

What provoked the Boston Massacre?

What was the Boston Massacre? The incident was the climax of growing unrest in Boston, fueled by colonists' opposition to a series of acts passed by the British Parliament. ... As the mob insulted and threatened them, the soldiers fired their muskets, killing five colonists.

What did the Boston Massacre lead to?

The Boston Massacre was a signal event leading to the Revolutionary War. It led directly to the Royal Governor evacuating the occupying army from the town of Boston. It would soon bring the revolution to armed rebellion throughout the colonies.

What could have prevented the American Revolutionary War?

The American Revolution could have been avoided if the British did not keep such a tight hold on the colonists, gave them representation in parliament, and gave them the birthrights they desperately wanted. …

Was the American Revolution avoidable Why or why not?

The American Revolution was not avoidable because the king wanted complete control over the colonies.

How could the British have prevented the revolution?

How could the British government have prevented the American Revolution? ... By allowing colonists to elect representatives to Parliament. You just studied 10 terms!

Why did the Boston Massacre increase the colonists anger toward Great Britain?

The Boston massacre increased the anger toward Great Britain because the British soldiers shot without orders and killed five people for just harassing them. Paul Revere produced an engraving of the massacre, which was widely circulated.

Why were Bostonians angry with the British troops?

The sudden rise in population by the British troops meant all food and fuel had to be spread more thinly. There were also constant clashes between the townspeople and British soldiers. Bostonians resented the military presence and the British looked upon the citizenry as unruly rabble.

What was the most significant outcome of the Boston Massacre?

What was the most significant outcome of the Boston Massacre? It demonstrated to the colonists that British troops would resort to violence and restore order in the colonies.

Were the colonists justified in their actions at the Boston Massacre?

Just as in Paul Revere's cartoon of the “Boston Massacre” the colonists persuaded the rest of the colonists that it is all England's fault, when in truth the events did not occur like that. ... The colonists were not justified in commencing a war with England. From 1740 to 1770 the 13 colonies were at war with England.

What opinion might a British soldier have had about the Boston Massacre?

The British soldiers would have been angry about how the Boston Massacre was given a "false representation." The soldiers would argue stating that the incident was an act of self-defense due to the hostile actions of the colonists and not a massacre at all.

Is Captain Preston innocent?

1722—c. 1798) was a British officer, a captain who served in Boston in the Province of Massachusetts Bay. He commanded troops in the Boston Massacre in 1770 and was tried for murder, but he was acquitted. Historians have never settled whether he ordered his men to fire on the colonists.

Was the American Revolution inevitable or could it have been avoided?

The actions of British and colonial leaders made the American Revolution unavoidable. The actions of people on both sides sank efforts to fix British and American colonial relations, but the conflict could have been avoided if some had acted differently.

Why the revolutionary war was inevitable?

The American Revolution was inevitable because England kept trying to take full control of a self governing group of people who lived in the colonies. ... When the war ended in 1763, the British saw an opportunity to regain some money by taxing the colonies (Benson).

Could Great Britain have won the Revolutionary War?

Once the revolutionary war was lost, some in Britain argued that it had been unwinnable. ... In reality, Britain might well have won the war. The battle for New York in 1776 gave England an excellent opportunity for a decisive victory. France had not yet allied with the Americans.

What efforts were avoided during war?

What efforts were made to avoid war? The Olive Branch Petition, Repeal of the Stamp Act and the Plain truth pamphlet are all examples of attempts to avoid war.

What could have prevented the colonists declaring independence and going to war?

6. What could have prevented the colonists' declaring independence and going to war? Answers will vary. Most students, however, will note that if Parliament had acquiesced to the colonial notion of representation in government, colonists may have been satisfied, and the Revolutionary war might never have occurred.

How was the Boston Massacre different from the battles of the Revolutionary War?

The Boston Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary War. ... The massacre resulted in the death of five colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage.

Who fired the first shot at the Boston Massacre?

Private Hugh Montgomery was the first British soldier to fire in the Boston Massacre. According to many historic documents, he was also identified by many witnesses in the trial as the man who killed Crispus Attucks.

Can the event really be considered a massacre?

One of the most common myths is that the BM was the event that led to the Revolutionary War. In fact, many important events led up to the massacre. It was called a massacre by the use of propaganda. ... It was really an accident and the radicals tried to use propaganda and turn something small into something big.

Why was the Boston Massacre significant quizlet?

The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770 in Boston, Massachusetts on King Street. It started as a fight between the colonists and British soldiers. The colonists were angry over the Townshend Acts, which led to riots. It was important because it was a turning point in America's quest for independence.